Anthropology and Colonialism

Diane Katherine Lewis

Current Anthropology · 1973 · 365 citations · 18 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Anthropology emerged from European colonial expansion, with colonialism shaping its outsider‑centric methods and exploitation of subjects; the post‑liberation undermining of this role has created an impasse between anthropologists and the peoples they studied. The postcolonial era demands new roles and methodologies for anthropologists, prompting examination of native anthropology as a potential alternative. The study examines biases of the traditional outsider role and explores native ethnography of Europe and educational innovations among Third World people in the United States as alternatives.

Abstract

Anthropology emerged from the colonial expansion of Europe. Colonialism structured the relationship between anthropologists and the people they studied and had an effect on methodological and conceptual formulations in the discipline. For example, the role of "objective outsider" with its resultant professional exploitation of subject matter can be viewed as an academic manifestation of colonialism. Some of the biases inherent in this role are examinated. With the liberation of formerly colonized peoples, the traditional role of the anthropologist has been undermined. This has resulted in an impasse between anthropologists and many of the people they formerly studied. The postcolonial era clearly calls for new roles for anthropologists and a more relevant set of methodologies and concepts. In the search for alternatives, consideration is given to the "native ethnography" of Europe and the insights springing from current educational innovations among Third World people in the United States. In this context, the advantages of a "native anthropology" are examined as one possible alternative.

References

18