Chemistry - A European Journal · 1997 · 42 citations · 36 references
Natural SciencesChemistryCatalysisInorganic ChemistryOrganic ChemistryCatalyst DesignCatalyst PreparationCatalytic MaterialsCatalytic MechanismsHeterocycle SynthesisSupported CatalystsAsymmetric Heterocycle SynthesisCatalyst Structure - Activity RelationshipsCatalytic Reaction MechanismsCyclopropanation ReactionsEnantioselective Catalyst DesignRuthenium-catalyzed CouplingSchiff Base CatalysisTransition-metal-catalyzed Functionalization
Abstract The scope and limitations of asymmetric syntheses of 2‐siloxycyclopropanecarboxylates 3 were examined by combination of structurally typical silyl enol ethers and methyl diazoacetate with various chiral catalysts. It was found that the Schiff base complex 5 ṁCu(OAc) 2 and the bisoxazoline complex 6 ṁCuOTf gave the highest stereoselectivities (e.g., 72% ee for cis ‐ 3d with 5 ṁCu(OAc) 2 as catalyst or 76% and 73% ee for cis ‐ and trans ‐ 3a , respectively, with 6 ‐CuOTf as catalyst). High enantioselectivities or diastereoselectivities were obtained. Other catalysts based on copper, rhodium or ruthenium complexes afforded significantly lower values. In further investigations, Evans's bisoxazoline complex 6 ‐CuOTf proved to be limited to 1,1‐disubstituted silyl enol ethers (e.g. 1a and 1e ) for high enantiomeric excesses (up to > 95%, poor diastereoselectivities) and to 1,2‐substituted enol ethers (e.g. 1e ) for high diastereoselectivities ( cis:trans < 3:97, ee trans = 49%).
36
Dieter G. Müller, Gisela Umbricht, Beat Weber et al. · Helvetica Chimica Acta · 1991 · 459 citations