Internalism and Externalism in the Epistemology of Testimony

Abstract

Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchVolume 87, Issue 3 p. 532-557 Internalism and Externalism in the Epistemology of Testimony MIKKEL GERKEN, MIKKEL GERKEN University of CopenhagenSearch for more papers by this author MIKKEL GERKEN, MIKKEL GERKEN University of CopenhagenSearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 October 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00532.xCitations: 21Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Bonjour, Laurence. 1992: Internalism/Externalism. In A Companion to Epistemology, eds. J. Dancy and E. Sosa, pp. 132–136. Oxford Blackwell. Bonjour, Laurence. 1985: The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Harvard University Press. Burge, Tyler. 1993: Content Preservation. Philosophical Review, 103, pp. 457–488. Burge, Tyler. 2003: Perceptual Entitlement. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research 67, pp. 503–548. Burge, Tyler. 2007: Post-script to Individualism and the Mental. Burge, Tyler. 2010: Origins of Objectivity. Oxford University Press. Casullo, Albert. 2003: A priori justification. Oxford University Press. Casullo, Albert. 2007: What is entitlement?Acta Analytica, 22, pp. 269–279. Coady, C.A.J.: 1992: Testimony: A Philosophical Study. (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Faulkner, Paul. 2000: The social character of testimonial knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XCVII, No. 11, pp. 581–601. Faulkner, Paul. 2002: On the Rationality of Our Response to Testimony. Synthese, 131, pp. 353–370. Fricker, Elizabeth. 1995: Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony. Mind 104, pp. 393–411. Gerken, Mikkel. Ms: Discursive Justification and Skepticism. Gerken, Mikkel. 2012: Critical Study of Goldberg's Relying on Others. Episteme, 9, pp. 81–88. Gerken, Mikkel. 2011a: Warrant and Action. Synthese, Vol. 178, No. 3, pp. 529–547. Gerken, Mikkel. 2011b: Conceptual Equivocation and Warrant by Reasoning. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Published online, June 4th 2010. Gerken, Mikkel. 2009: Conceptual Equivocation and Epistemic Relevance. dialectica, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 117–132. Gerken, Mikkel. 2007: Epistemic Reasoning and the Mental. UCLA Dissertation. Goldberg, Sanford. 2008: Anti-Individualism. Cambridge University Press. Goldberg, Sanford. 2010: Relying on Others. Oxford University Press. Graham, Peter. 2000: The Reliability of Testimony. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LXI, no. 3, pp. 695–709. Graham, Peter. 2010: Testimonial Entitlement and the Function of Comprehension. In A. Haddock, A. Millar and D. Pritchard, (eds.), Social Epistemology, pp. 148–174, Oxford University Press. Lackey, Jennifer. 2008: Learning From Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford University Press. Miller, P.M. and Fagley, N.S. 1991: The Effects of Framing, Problem Variations, and Providing Rational on Choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17: 517–22. Pollock, J. and Cruz, J. 1999: Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield. Plantinga, Alum1993: Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schmitt, F. 1999: Social Epistemology. In J. Greco and E. Sosa (eds), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Oxford Blackwell, pp. 354–382. Stanovitch, K.E.1999: Who is Rational?: Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. Takemura, K. 1994: Influence on Elaboration on the Framing of Decision. Journal of Psychology 128: 33–39. Citing Literature Volume87, Issue3November 2013Pages 532-557 ReferencesRelatedInformation