BMC Anesthesiology · 2015 · 40 citations · 26 references
Veterinary MedicineAnesthesiologyPharmacologyAnesthesiaDental AnesthesiaGeneral AnesthesiaAnesthesia For Dental ProceduresAnesthesia In Special-needs PatientsAntiepileptic PharmacologyIntellectual Disability AssociationOnset Time Of AnesthesiaPropofol AnesthesiaPropofol PharmacokineticsPropofol Use
BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of the type of neurological disorder on the required propofol dose for anesthesia and the time to emerge from anesthesia during dental treatment in patients with autism (AU), cerebral palsy (CP), and intellectual disability (ID), some of whom also had epilepsy. METHODS: We studied 224 patients with a neurological disorder who underwent dental treatment under intravenous general anesthesia. Patients were categorized according to neurological disorder (AU, CP, and ID; and with or without an antiepileptic). The propofol dose required for anesthesia, time to emerge, and modeled propofol blood concentration at emergence were evaluated. RESULTS: In patients not given an antiepileptic, we found no significant differences in the propofol dose, modeled propofol blood concentration at emergence, or time to emerge among patients with AU, CP, and ID (P > 0.05). When using an antiepileptic, the dose of propofol (5.7 ± 1.51 mg/kg/h) was significantly lower than without an antiepileptic (6.8 ± 1.27 mg/kg/h) (P < 0.0001). The modeled propofol blood concentration at emergence in patients given an antiepileptic (0.5 ± 0.03 μg/ml) was significantly lower than without an antiepileptic (0.7 ± 0.02 μg/ml) (P < 0.0001). The time to emerge in patients given an antiepileptic (29.5 ± 12.5 min) was significantly longer than without an antiepileptic (21.6 min ± 10.0 min) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The propofol dose required for anesthesia and the time to emerge from anesthesia are not affected by the type of neurological disorder, but are affected by antiepileptic use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000014179), Date of registration 4 June 2014.
26
PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL DRIVEN INFUSION OF PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN
Bret Marsh, Martin White, N S Morton et al. · British Journal of Anaesthesia · 1991 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Junsheng Wang, Kari T. Kivistö, Pertti J. Neuvonen et al. · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2001 · 156 citations · Full text