Foreign Currency Derivatives versus Foreign Currency Debt and the Hedging Premium

Ephraïm Clark, Amrit Judge

European Financial Management · 2008 · 80 citations · 44 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study compares the effect on firm value of foreign currency hedging strategies based on exposure duration and instrument type. The authors evaluate firm value impacts of hedges identified by short‑ or long‑term exposure and by instrument type (forwards, options, swaps, foreign‑currency debt). They find that short‑term hedges (forwards/options) are used for export‑related short‑term exposure, while foreign‑currency debt and swaps hedge long‑term exposure from foreign assets, and that foreign‑currency derivatives increase firm value but foreign‑currency debt alone offers no premium unless combined with derivatives, with swaps generating more value than short‑term derivatives.

Abstract

Abstract This paper compares the effect on firm value of different foreign currency (FC) financial hedging strategies identified by type of exposure (short‐ or long‐term) and type of instrument (forwards, options, swaps and foreign currency debt). We find that hedging instruments depend on the type of exposure. Short‐term instruments such as FC forwards and/or options are used to hedge short‐term exposure generated from export activity while FC debt and FC swaps into foreign currency (but not into domestic currency) are used to hedge long‐term exposure arising from assets located in foreign locations. Our results relating to the value effects of foreign currency hedging indicate that foreign currency derivatives use increases firm value but there is no hedging premium associated with foreign currency debt hedging, except when combined with foreign currency derivatives. Taken individually, FC swaps generate more value than short‐term derivatives.

References

44