BMC Neuroscience · 2002 · 558 citations · 128 references
Life SciencesMolecular BiologyNeuroscienceGene ExpressionGenomicsTranscriptomicsDifferential Gene Expression AnalysisGene Expression In NeuronsGene Expression ProfilingNervous TissueNeuronal Gene ExpressionPeripheral Nerve InjuryDorsal Root Ganglion SurgeryMicroarray AnalysisNeuronal Gene Expression ProfilingNeuronal TranscriptomicsQuantitative In Situ HybridizationTissue Microarray AnalysisTranscriptional Regulation GenesTranscriptomics Of Neural Tissue
BACKGROUND: Rat oligonucleotide microarrays were used to detect changes in gene expression in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) 3 days following sciatic nerve transection (axotomy). Two comparisons were made using two sets of triplicate microarrays, naïve versus naïve and naïve versus axotomy. RESULTS: Microarray variability was assessed using the naïve versus naïve comparison. These results support use of a P < 0.05 significance threshold for detecting regulated genes, despite the large number of hypothesis tests required. For the naïve versus axotomy comparison, a 2-fold cut off alone led to an estimated error rate of 16%; combining a >1.5-fold expression change and P < 0.05 significance reduced the estimated error to 5%. The 2-fold cut off identified 178 genes while the combined >1.5-fold and P < 0.05 criteria generated 240 putatively regulated genes, which we have listed. Many of these have not been described as regulated in the DRG by axotomy. Northern blot, quantitative slot blots and in situ hybridization verified the expression of 24 transcripts. These data showed an 83% concordance rate with the arrays; most mismatches represent genes with low expression levels reflecting limits of array sensitivity. A significant correlation was found between actual mRNA differences and relative changes between microarrays (r2 = 0.8567). Temporal patterns of individual genes regulation varied. CONCLUSIONS: We identify parameters for microarray analysis which reduce error while identifying many putatively regulated genes. Functional classification of these genes suggest reorganization of cell structural components, activation of genes expressed by immune and inflammatory cells and down-regulation of genes involved in neurotransmission.
128
Z. David Luo, Sandra R. Chaplan, Emiliano S. Higuera et al. · Journal of Neuroscience · 2001 · 613 citations · Full text
Gregory J. Michael, John V. Priestley · Journal of Neuroscience · 1999 · 505 citations · Full text
Sulayman D. Dib‐Hajj, Lynda Tyrrell, J.A. Black et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 1998 · 504 citations