2003 · 20 citations · 4 references
ComputingComputer ScienceInformation RetrievalMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingEvaluation Of Retrieval SystemsInformation ExtractionRelevance FeedbackRetrieval ModelsWeb SearchFeature-based RankingFeature-based Ranking ModelsPrecisionRelevance ModelsRetrieval EvaluationTerm WeightingTrec EvaluationTrec Evaluation Framework
describing in following sections, respectively. A new IR system named TMiner has been built on which all experiments have been performed. In the system, Primary Feature Model (PFM) [1] has been proposed and combined with BM2500 term weighting [2] , which led to encouraging results. Word-pair searching has also been performed and improves system precision. Both approaches are described in robust experiments (section 2), and they were also used in web track experiments. 1. Novelty track Our research on this year's novelty track mainly focused on four aspects: (1) unsupervised relevance judgment; (2) efficient sentence redundancy computing; (3) supervised sentence classification; (4) supervised redundancy threshold learning. 1.1. Unsupervised relevance judgment The work of finding relevant information is useful for task1 and task3. Since words mismatch problem is dominant in sentence comparison, three kinds of approaches have been carried out in unsupervised relevance judgment to solve the problem as following. (1) Query Expansion (QE) using WordNet synonymy and hyponomy, and Dr Lin Dekang’s dictionary of term dependency [3];
4
Marti A. Hearst, Susan Dumais, E. Osuna et al. · IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications · 1998 · 6.9K citations
Stephen Robertson, Steve Walker · 1999 · 316 citations
Local Feedback in Full-Text Retrieval Systems
Rony Attar, Aviezri S. Fraenkel · Journal of the ACM · 1977 · 234 citations · Full text