Publication | Closed Access
“Worst Case” Aerosol Testing Parameters: II. Efficiency Dependence of Commercial Respirator Filters on Humidity Pretreatment
25
Citations
0
References
1989
Year
Environmental ChemistryChemical EngineeringEngineeringHumidity PretreatmentAerosol TransportAir SamplingEnvironmental EngineeringAerosol SamplingRelative Humidity PretreatmentAir QualityCommercial Respirator FiltersEfficiency DependenceWater TreatmentIndoor Air QualityAir PollutionAir CleaningAerosol ChallengeRelative Humidity
Previous studies have shown that relative humidity has a degrading effect on the performance of commercially available particulate air-purifying respirator filters. That degradation results from a reduction of charge within the filter. This study was done to evaluate the time-dependent effects of relative humidity pretreatment and the reduction of charge on filter penetration against a most penetrating, "worst case" aerosol challenge. Filters of the dust and mist; dust, fume, and mist; paint, lacquer, and enamel mist; and high efficiency types were tested after being pretreated in an environment of 38 degrees C and 85% relative humidity for periods up to 42 days. After various intervals of pretreatment (1, 7, 14, 28, and 42 days), the filters were tested against neutralized worst-case sodium chloride (NaCl) and dioctyl phthalate (DOP) aerosols for percent penetration. The results showed a drop in filter efficiency of approximately 2%-6% depending on preconditioning time, except for the high efficiency filters tested which showed no detectable change.