Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2005 · 477 citations · 26 references
MedicineGeriatric MedicineOncologyChemotherapyGeriatric AssessmentPalliative CareCancer Survival AnalysisComprehensive Geriatric AssessmentGeriatric Health AssessmentGeriatric OncologyGeriatric Palliative CareSupportive Care In CancerElderly PopulationGeriatric Assessment ToolsNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TreatmentPatient-reported Functional StatusPrognostic Factors AnalysisPrognostic PredictionPrognostic Prediction ModelsQuality Of Life Prognosis
The study examined whether baseline functional status, comorbidity, and quality‑of‑life assessments predict overall survival in elderly patients with advanced non‑small‑cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy. Researchers measured activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL), assessed comorbidity with a 33‑item checklist and Charlson scale, estimated quality of life using EORTC QLQ‑C30 items 29–30, categorized ADL, IADL, and QoL by quartiles, and performed Cox regression stratified by treatment arm. Higher baseline QoL and IADL scores were significantly associated with longer survival, whereas ADL and Charlson score were not; additionally, performance status 2 and more metastatic sites predicted shorter survival, indicating that pretreatment QoL and IADL can improve prognostic prediction for treatment planning.
To study the prognostic value for overall survival of baseline assessment of functional status, comorbidity, and quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy.Data from 566 patients enrolled onto the phase III randomized Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) study were analyzed. Functional status was measured as activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL). The presence of comorbidity was assessed with a checklist of 33 items; items 29 and 30 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were used to estimate QoL. ADL was dichotomized as none versus one or more dependency. For IADL and QoL, three categories were defined using first and third quartiles as cut points. Comorbidity was summarized using the Charlson scale. Analysis was performed by Cox model, and stratified by treatment arm.Better values of baseline QoL (P = .0003) and IADL (P = .04) were significantly associated with better prognosis, whereas ADL (P = .44) and Charlson score (P = .66) had no prognostic value. Performance status 2 (P = .006) and a higher number of metastatic sites (P = .02) also predicted shorter overall survival.Pretreatment global QoL and IADL scores, but not ADL and comorbidity, have significant prognostic value for survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who were treated with chemotherapy. Using these scores in clinical practice might improve prognostic prediction for treatment planning.
26
N.K. Aaronson, Sam H. Ahmedzai, Bengt Bergman et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 1993 · 16K citations