The after breakfast 50‐g, 1‐hour glucose challenge test in urban Mexican pregnant women, Its sensitivity and specificity evaluated by three diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus

Adalberto Parra, Rocío Hidalgo, Marcela Zambrana

Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · 1999 · 20 citations · 16 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To study the sensitivity and specificity of the 50-g, 1-hour gestational glucose challenge test performed 1 to 2 hours after a non-standardized home breakfast in urban Mexican women by using three different gestational diabetes mellitus diagnostic criteria. METHODS: Four hundred and forty-five consecutive women of 24-28 weeks gestation were studied. The glucose challenge test was performed in the fed state and a week later a fasting 100-g, 3-hours oral glucose tolerance test was carried out in all of them. Duplicate serum glucose concentrations were determined by a glucose-oxidase method. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using three different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: The glucose challenge test performed as indicated, with a cutoff of 7.8 mmol/L, had 88-89% sensitivity and 85-87% specificity when using as diagnostic criteria those proposed by the National Diabetes Data Group and by Carpenter & Coustan; by using Sacks et al. criteria, the values were 82% and 88%, respectively. Considering only pregnant women > or = 25 years of age, the sensitivity increased to 92% with the National Diabetes Data Group criteria. Pregnant women < 25 years of age had significantly lower blood glucose values than those with age > or = 25 years during the glucose tolerance test. CONCLUSIONS: For the general group the sensitivity of the glucose challenge test performed 1 to 2 hours after breakfast was similar, based on the National Diabetes Data Group and the Carpenter & Coustan's diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. However, when pregnant women > or = 25 years of age were considered, the use of the former criteria yielded a slightly better sensitivity.

References

16