Predicting design induced pilot error using HET (human error template) – A new formal human error identification method for flight decks

Neville A. Stanton, Don Harris, Paul M. Salmon, Jason Demagalski, Andrew J. Marshall, Mark S. Young, Sidney Dekker, Thomas Waldmann

The Aeronautical Journal · 2006 · 43 citations · 12 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Many formal error identification techniques exist, but none have been validated for aviation, limiting their usefulness for design‑induced flight‑deck error reduction. The paper aims to develop a new human error identification technique, HET, to support human‑factors certification criteria that reduce design‑induced errors on large civil aircraft flight decks. HET is a diagnostic template that was benchmarked against SHERPA, HAZOP, and HEIST to predict design‑induced errors during approach and landing tasks. In a validation study, HET outperformed all three existing techniques and is recommended as a useful adjunct to the proposed certification process.

Abstract

Abstract Human factors certification criteria are being developed for large civil aircraft with the objective of reducing the incidence of design-induced error on the flight deck. Many formal error identification techniques currently exist which have been developed in non-aviation contexts but none have been validated for use to this end. This paper describes a new human error identification technique (HET – human error template) designed specifically as a diagnostic tool for the identification of design-induced error on the flight deck. HET is benchmarked against three existing techniques (SHERPA – systematic human error reduction and prediction approach; human error HAZOP – hazard and operability study; and HEIST – human error In systems tool). HET outperforms all three existing techniques in a validation study comparing predicted errors to actual errors reported during an approach and landing task in a modern, highly automated commercial aircraft. It is concluded that HET should provide a useful tool as a adjunct to the proposed human factors certification process.

References

12