The Prostate · 2014 · 32 citations · 24 references
Life SciencesBiochemistryUrologyGlycobiologyProstate DiseaseProteomicsBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaBiomarkers In Genitourinary CancerClinical ProteomicsGlycan AnalysisGlycoproteomicsProstate CancerDiagnostic Testing AccuracyGlycoprotein AnalysisGlycoproteomic BiomarkersN-glycan Core FucosylationProstate Cancer DiagnosisProstate Tumor MarkersProstate Volume MeasurementProtein Glycosylation Analysis
BACKGROUND: Serum prostate-specific antigen (sPSA) measurement is widely used as opportunistic screening tool for prostate cancer (PCa). sPSA suffers from considerable sensitivity and specificity problems, particularly in the diagnostic gray zone (sPSA 4-10 µg/L). Furthermore, sPSA is not able to discriminate between poorly-, moderately-, and well-differentiated PCa. We investigated prostatic protein glycosylation profiles as a potential PCa biomarker. METHODS: Differences in total urine N-glycosylation profile of prostatic proteins were determined between healthy volunteers (n = 54), patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH; n = 93) and newly diagnosed PCa patients (n = 74). Variations in N-glycosylation profile and prostate volume were combined into one urinary glycoprofile marker (UGM). Additionally, differences in N-glycosylation were identified between Gleason <7, =7, and >7. RESULTS: The UGM was able to discriminate BPH from PCa, overall and in the diagnostic gray zone (P < 0.001). The UGM showed comparable diagnostic accuracy to sPSA, but gave an additive diagnostic value to sPSA (P < 0.001). In the diagnostic gray zone the UGM performed significantly better than sPSA (P < 0.001). A significant difference was found in core-fucosylation of biantennary structures and overall core-fucosylation of multiantennary structures between Gleason < 7 and Gleason > 7 (P = 0.010 and P = 0.020, respectively) and between Gleason = 7 and Gleason > 7 (P = 0.011 and P = 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The UGM shows high potential as PCa biomarker, particularly in the diagnostic gray zone. Further research is needed to validate these findings.
24
Ahmedin Jemal, Freddie Bray, Jacques Ferlay et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2011 · 55K citations · Full text
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
Jelle O. Barentsz, Jonathan Richenberg, R. Clements et al. · European Radiology · 2012 · 2.4K citations · Full text