2009 · 56 citations · 23 references
ComputingComputer ScienceFeature EngineeringMachine LearningStatistical LearningAffective ComputingClassificationDecision TreesEmotion RecognitionPattern RecognitionSpeech RecognitionAccuracyEmotion Recognition EvaluationEmotion Recognition From SpeechNeural Network ClassificationRandom Forest ClassificationSpeaker-independent Speech RecognitionSpeech Signal AnalysisSpeech Signal Processing
In the present paper a comparison of two classifiers for speech signal emotion recognition is presented. Recognition was performed on emotional Berlin Database. Within this work we concentrate on the evaluation of a speaker-dependent and speaker independent emotion recognition classification. One hundred thirty three (133) speech features obtained from speech signal processing. A basic set of 35 features was selected by statistical method and artificial neural network and random forest classifiers were used. Seven classes were categorized, namely anger, happiness, anxiety/fear, sadness, boredom, disgust and neutral. In speaker dependent framework, artificial neural network classification reached an accuracy of 83,17%, and random forest 77,19%. In speaker independent framework, for artificial neural network classification a mean accuracy of 55% was reached, while random forest reached a mean accuracy of 48%.
23
Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer
Ear and Hearing · 2011 · 8.1K citations
Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Alan Stuart, Sidney Siegel · Economica · 1957 · 3.4K citations
Digital processing of speech signals
Pattern Recognition · 1980 · 2.6K citations
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering +14
Emotion recognition in human-computer interaction
Roddy Cowie, Ellen Douglas‐Cowie, Nicolas Tsapatsoulis et al. · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2001 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Computing, Linguistics, Psychology +17