American Ethnologist · 1991 · 416 citations · 40 references
Social SciencesAnthropologyDevelopment StudiesAnthropology Of DevelopmentApplied AnthropologyCultural AnthropologyInterpretive AnthropologyPostcolonial AnthropologyLocal Knowledge TransmissionSocial Change Models
Since WWII, development discourses have shaped relations between industrialized and Third World nations, yet most anthropologists have not critiqued these practices, though some now serve as culture experts in development work. The article traces the rise of development anthropology since the mid‑1970s and proposes ways to redefine its role in development. The authors argue that development anthropologists, by following mainstream models, reinforce ethnocentric development paradigms and recycle conventional modernization views under the guise of cultural sensitivity. Keywords: development anthropology, applied anthropology, history of anthropology, development studies, critical theory.
Since the end of World War II, relations between industrialized nations and Third World countries have been greatly determined and mediated by the discourses and practices of “development.” Although anthropologists in general have not prob‐lematized the existence of such discourses and practices, a growing number of them have joined the applied field as “culture experts” in development activities. This article traces the rise and growth of “development anthropology” since the mid‐1970s. Because of their adherence to mainstream models in both anthropology and development, the article argues, development anthropologists reinforce ethnocentric and dominating models of development. Moreover, these practitioners disturbingly recycle, in the name of cultural sensitivity and local knowledge, conventional views of modernization, social change, and the Third World. Some thoughts for redefining the role of anthropology in development are offered. [ development anthropology, applied anthropology, history of anthropology, development studies, critical theory ]
40