The Importance of Waist Circumference in the Definition of Metabolic Syndrome

Peter T. Katzmarzyk, Ian Janssen, Robert Ross, Timothy S. Church, Steven N. Blair

Diabetes Care · 2006 · 273 citations · 17 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study compared how well the NCEP, revised NCEP, and IDF metabolic syndrome criteria predict all‑cause and cardiovascular mortality and examined the influence of waist circumference on that risk. Using 20,789 white, non‑Hispanic men aged 20–83 from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study, the authors followed participants for 11.4 years to record all‑cause and cardiovascular deaths. Men meeting the IDF, NCEP, or NCEP‑R definitions had 30%, 19.7%, and 27% prevalence, respectively, and their all‑cause mortality relative risks were 1.26, 1.36, and 1.31; cardiovascular mortality risks were 1.67, 1.79, and 1.67, with a significant increase in CVD deaths across higher waist‑circumference categories, indicating comparable predictive performance but highlighting waist circumference as an important, though potentially over‑restrictive, component.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive ability of the National Cholesterol Education Panel (NCEP), revised NCEP (NCEP-R), and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) metabolic syndrome criteria for mortality risk, and to examine the effects of waist circumference on mortality within the context of these criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The sample included 20,789 white, non-Hispanic men 20–83 years of age from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. The main outcome measures were all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality over 11.4 years of follow-up. RESULTS—The proportions of men with the metabolic syndrome were 19.7, 27, and 30% at baseline, respectively, according to NCEP, NCEP-R, and IDF criteria. A total of 632 deaths (213 CVD) occurred. The relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs of all-cause mortality were 1.36 (1.14–1.62), 1.31 (1.11–1.54), and 1.26 (1.07–1.49) for the NCEP, NCEP-R, and IDF definitions, respectively. The corresponding RRs for CVD mortality were 1.79 (1.35–2.37), 1.67 (1.27–2.19), and 1.67 (1.27–2.20). Additionally, there was a significant trend for a higher risk of CVD mortality across waist circumference categories (<94, 94–102, and >102 cm) among men with at least two additional metabolic syndrome risk factors (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS—The prediction of mortality with IDF and NCEP metabolic syndrome criteria was comparable in men. Waist circumference is a valuable component of metabolic syndrome; however, the IDF requirement of an elevated waist circumference warrants caution given that a large proportion of men with normal waist circumference have multiple risk factors and an increased risk of mortality.

References

17