The Sociological Review · 2013 · 186 citations · 68 references
HumanitiesSexuality StudiesSociologyAnthropology Of GenderFeminist TheorySexuality TheoryQueer AnthropologySexual SubjectivityAnthropocentric AttitudesBiopolitics Of SexualitySexual EmbodimentSexual Subject FormationSexuality Discourse
Sexuality research must resist humanist enticements by first using post‑structuralism to reveal how social contexts produce culturally specific sexual knowledgeabilities, and then by adopting an anti‑humanist stance that overturns the anthropocentric privileging of the human body as the locus of sexuality. The paper establishes a language and landscape for a Deleuze‑inspired anti‑humanist sociology of sexuality that relocates sexuality beyond bodies and individuals. Sexuality is conceived as an impersonal affective flow within assemblages of bodies, things, ideas, and social institutions, producing sexual capacities in bodies while assemblages territorialize bodies’ desire, thereby shaping sexuality as infinitely variable yet typically highly restricted. The authors illustrate applying this anti‑humanist ontology to empirical data on sexuality‑assemblages and discuss its theoretical and methodological strengths and weaknesses.
Two theoretical moves are required to resist the ‘humanist enticements’ associated with sexuality. Post-structuralism supplies the first, showing how the social produces culturally specific sexual knowledgeabilities. A second anti-humanist move is then needed to overturn anthropocentric privileging of the human body and subject as the locus of sexuality. In this paper we establish a language and landscape for a Deleuze-inspired anti-humanist sociology of sexuality that shifts the location of sexuality away from bodies and individuals. Sexuality in this view is an impersonal affective flow within assemblages of bodies, things, ideas and social institutions, which produces sexual (and other) capacities in bodies. Assemblages territorialize bodies' desire, setting limits on what it can do: this process determines the shape of sexuality, which is consequently both infinitely variable and typically highly restricted. We illustrate how this anti-humanist ontology may be applied to empirical data to explore sexuality-assemblages, and conclude by exploring the theoretical and methodological advantages and disadvantages of an anti-humanist assemblage approach to sexuality.
68
Anthony F. C. Wallace, Harold Garfinkel · American Sociological Review · 1968 · 12.6K citations
Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia.
Hernán Vera, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari et al. · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · 1978 · 3.2K citations
Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
Terry A. Kupers · Telos · 1978 · 2.8K citations
Humanities, History, Psychiatry +12
Hélène Cixous, Keith Cohen, Paula Marantz Cohen · Signs · 1976 · 2.2K citations