The Journal of Infectious Diseases · 1996 · 27 citations · 10 references
Veterinary MedicineBiologyInfectious DiseasesDiagnostic ParasitologyMolecular DiagnosticsParasitologyBlood Parasite DiagnosisInfectious Disease Molecular TestingMalariaMicroscopic ExaminationMolecular Diagnosis Of ParasitesParasitic Disease DiagnosisMalaria ParasitesMethod Detection LimitMixed Infection DiagnosticsMixed Parasitic InfectionsMixed Protozoal InfectionsMolecular Detection Of ParasitesMolecular HybridizationParasitemia Quantification
In a blind field evaluation of a nonisotopic liquid hybridization assay for detection of malaria parasites, 100 blood samples were tested from an area in which malaria is endemic; light microscopy was used as the reference test. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the hybridization assay were 100%. One sample that was microscopy-negative and hybridization-positive was positive when reexamined. Another sample that was microscopy-positive and hybridization-negative was negative at reexamination. The detection limit of the test was > or = 0.0005% parasitemia. Four samples with mixed infections were misdiagnosed by microscopy as single-species infections. Four samples diagnosed as mixed infections by microscopy and single infection by the hybridization test had no evidence of a second Plasmodium species upon reexamination. The polymerase chain-reaction-based nonisotopic liquid hybridization assay was better than conventional light microscopy in detecting low-grade parasite infection and offers an exceptional advantage for detecting mixed infections.
10
Georges Snounou, Suganya Viriyakosol, William Jarra et al. · Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology · 1993 · 919 citations
Arthur E. Brown, Kevin C. Kain, Jaroon Pipithkul et al. · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 1992 · 137 citations