The Journal of Law and Economics · 1996 · 101 citations · 16 references
Social SciencesPolitical ScienceAmerican PoliticsJudicial PoliticsLegislative PoliticsChecks And BalancesCourt StructureJudicial BehaviorJudicial InstitutionsJudicial PolicymakingJudicial PowerCaseload SizeCourt-executive RelationsJudicial Workload Allocation
Congress has many available tools to influence the federal judiciary. In this article, we consider Congress' ability to balance, or stack, the courts through the creation of federal judgeships. While caseload pressure often produces the need for more judgeships, we demonstrate that political party alignment between Congress and the president often determines the timing of the judicial expansion. The net effect of expanding during political alignment is to speed up changes in the political balance of the judiciary in favor of the current Congress. We also examine the determinants of expansion size and show that both political alignment and caseload pressure influence Congress' decision regarding how many judgeships to add.
16
Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics.
Hedley Rees, G. S. Maddala · The Economic Journal · 1985 · 1.4K citations
Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions
William N. Eskridge · The Yale Law Journal · 1991 · 375 citations · Full text
George J. Stigler · The Journal of Law and Economics · 1992 · 176 citations