Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer

Koen Peeters, Rob A.�E.�M. Tollenaar, Corrie A.M. Marijnen, Elma Meershoek‐Klein Kranenbarg, Willem H. Steup, Theo Wiggers, H.J.T. Rutten, Cornelis J.�H. van de Velde

British journal of surgery · 2004 · 663 citations · 30 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is a major complication of rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors associated with symptomatic anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS: Between 1996 and 1999, patients with operable rectal cancer were randomized to receive short-term radiotherapy followed by TME or to undergo TME alone. Eligible Dutch patients who underwent an anterior resection (924 patients) were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 107 patients (11.6 per cent). Pelvic drainage and the use of a defunctioning stoma were significantly associated with a lower anastomotic failure rate. A significant correlation between the absence of a stoma and anastomotic dehiscence was observed in both men and women, for both distal and proximal rectal tumours. In patients with anastomotic failure, the presence of pelvic drains and a covering stoma were both related to a lower requirement for surgical reintervention. CONCLUSION: Placement of one or more pelvic drains after TME may limit the consequences of anastomotic failure. The clinical decision to construct a defunctioning stoma is supported by this study.

References

30