The Journal of Physiology · 1991 · 32 citations · 19 references
MedicineVision ScienceBinocular VisionVisual PerceptionVisual PsychophysicsVisual AcuityVisual AdaptationAdaptation To LuminanceBinocular InteractionsBinocular SummationFoveal VisionInterocular SuppressionLight AdaptationLight Adaptation MechanismsVisibility
1. Spatial sensitivity of human foveal vision was examined using sinusoidally modulated gratings. Our primary concern was the influence of interocular light adaptation upon monocular visibility. 2. Interocular adapting influences depend upon spatial frequency and adapting luminance. Interocular adaptation has a negligible influence upon the sensitivity to 1 cycle/deg gratings. Any visible interocular adapting field improves the sensitivity to intermediate spatial frequencies (2-5 cycles/deg). 3. Brighter interocular backgrounds (greater than 0.1 cd/m2) improve sensitivity to higher spatial frequencies (10-20 cycles/deg). 4. The interocular adapting influences summarized in (2) and (3) above cannot be duplicated by monocular or binocular adaptation. Similarly, monocular or binocular adaptation have negligible influences upon binocular visibility. 5. The interocular adapting effect summarized in (3) above can be duplicated by pressure blinding the contralateral eye. We conclude that monocular spatial sensitivity is subject to a tonic interocular suppression (TIS) from the dark-adapted eye. 6. The spatial sensitivity resulting from binocular viewing is nearly identical to that observed by combining monocular viewing with interocular light adaptation. We suggest that the improvement in sensitivity resulting from two-eyed viewing may be attributable to the removal of TIS instead of to binocular physiological summation.
19
Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity
F. W. Campbell, D. G. Green · Nature · 1965 · 474 citations
Further developments in binocular summation
Randolph Blake, Michael E. Sloane, Robert A. Fox · Perception & Psychophysics · 1981 · 247 citations · Full text