The Journal of Law and Economics · 2001 · 83 citations · 21 references
BusinessEconomicsInsuranceInsurance EconomicsInsurance LawLiability InsuranceAutomobile InsuranceAutomobile Liability InsuranceAdverse Incentive EffectsAutomobile Insurance CoverageCompensation For Accident VictimsEndogeneity SpecificationIncentive Effects Of EqualizationInsurance IncentiveNo-fault Insurance
No‑fault insurance compensates accident victims and offers advantages over tort, yet it may reduce driving incentives and increase fatal accident rates. This study examines the impact of no‑fault insurance on fatal automobile accident rates. The authors analyze fatality data from all U.S. states between 1968 and 1994, controlling for the endogeneity of no‑fault laws.
This paper presents a theoretical and empirical analysis of the effects of no‐fault automobile insurance on fatal accident rates. As a mechanism for compensating the victims of automobile accidents, no‐fault insurance has several important advantages over the tort system. However, by restricting access to tort, no‐fault may weaken incentives for careful driving and lead to higher accident rates. We conduct an empirical analysis of automobile accident fatality rates in all U.S. states over the period 1968–94, controlling for the potential endogeneity of no‐fault laws. The results support the hypothesis that no‐fault is significantly associated with higher fatal accident rates than tort.
21
American Economic Review · 2009 · 1.7K citations
Phillip M. Farrell, Victor R. Fuchs, Victor R. Fuchs · Journal of Health Economics · 1982 · 320 citations
Speeding, Coordination, and the 55 MPH Limit
Charles Lave · American Economic Review · 1985 · 273 citations
Public Health, Transportation Planning, Highway Planning +16