The Incentive Effects of No‐Fault Automobile Insurance

J. David Cummins, Richard D. Phillips, Mary A. Weiss

The Journal of Law and Economics · 2001 · 83 citations · 21 references

Concepts

TL;DR

No‑fault insurance compensates accident victims and offers advantages over tort, yet it may reduce driving incentives and increase fatal accident rates. This study examines the impact of no‑fault insurance on fatal automobile accident rates. The authors analyze fatality data from all U.S. states between 1968 and 1994, controlling for the endogeneity of no‑fault laws.

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical and empirical analysis of the effects of no‐fault automobile insurance on fatal accident rates. As a mechanism for compensating the victims of automobile accidents, no‐fault insurance has several important advantages over the tort system. However, by restricting access to tort, no‐fault may weaken incentives for careful driving and lead to higher accident rates. We conduct an empirical analysis of automobile accident fatality rates in all U.S. states over the period 1968–94, controlling for the potential endogeneity of no‐fault laws. The results support the hypothesis that no‐fault is significantly associated with higher fatal accident rates than tort.

References

21