International Journal of American Linguistics · 2005 · 142 citations · 8 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsComparative LinguisticsHistorical LinguisticsMorphologyAreal LinguisticsCognate AnalysisComparative GrammarHistorical Comparative LinguisticsLanguage ClassificationLexical ComparisonAreal MorphologyCognate ClassificationData SparsityGenealogical ClassificationGenealogical ResearchLanguage PhylogenyLinguistic PhylogeneticsSwadesh Lists
Existing claims on the genealogical classification of the Aikanã, Kanoê, and Kwaza languages are premature due to sparse data. The study presents new data showing striking lexical, phonological, and grammatical similarities among the three languages. The authors compiled Swadesh lists of 100 basic words for each language and compared lexical, phonological, and grammatical features. The data suggest a possible distant relationship but are inconclusive, so the languages remain unclassified.
In view of the previous sparsity of data, the existing claims with regard to a genealogical classification of the Aikanã, Kanoê, and Kwaza languages of Rondônia, on the Brazilian side of the Guaporé River, are premature and unconvincing. Here, I present new data that contain some striking similarities on lexical, phonological, and grammatical levels. Although these data could point to a distant relationship between the three languages, the evidence is not conclusive and it remains problematical to distinguish possible cognates from areal traits or from chance similarities. Therefore, these three languages must still be considered as unclassified. Swadesh’s list of 100 basic words in the three languages is included in an appendix.
8
Lingua · 1959 · 392 citations
Lingua · 1989 · 379 citations
F. M. Voegelin · Anthropology News · 1964 · 312 citations