Publication | Open Access
Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power
285
Citations
14
References
2013
Year
EngineeringCarbon AccountingGlobal Nuclear PowerEarth ScienceGreenhouse GasesClimate Change MitigationFossil FuelNuclear DecommissioningGreenhouse Gas EmissionsEmission ReductionNuclear PowerNuclear EnergyProduction ResilienceFossil FuelsGlobal HealthEnergy TransitionNuclear SafetyCarbon EmissionsEnergy PolicyBusinessAir PollutionEmissions
Nuclear power, an abundant low‑carbon base‑load source, could significantly mitigate climate change and air pollution, but its future role has become uncertain after the 2011 Fukushima accident. We used historical nuclear generation data to estimate that it has prevented about 1.84 million air‑pollution deaths and 64 GtCO₂‑eq emissions, and projected that by mid‑century it could avert 0.42–7.04 million deaths and 80–240 GtCO₂‑eq depending on fuel substitution. In contrast, expanding unconstrained natural‑gas use would not mitigate climate change and would cause far more deaths than nuclear expansion.
In the aftermath of the March 2011 accident at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the future contribution of nuclear power to the global energy supply has become somewhat uncertain. Because nuclear power is an abundant, low-carbon source of base-load power, it could make a large contribution to mitigation of global climate change and air pollution. Using historical production data, we calculate that global nuclear power has prevented an average of 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2-eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that would have resulted from fossil fuel burning. On the basis of global projection data that take into account the effects of the Fukushima accident, we find that nuclear power could additionally prevent an average of 420,000-7.04 million deaths and 80-240 GtCO2-eq emissions due to fossil fuels by midcentury, depending on which fuel it replaces. By contrast, we assess that large-scale expansion of unconstrained natural gas use would not mitigate the climate problem and would cause far more deaths than expansion of nuclear power.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1