STAGE PROGRESSION IN TA PAPILLARY UROTHELIAL TUMORS: RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE, IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EXPRESSION OF TUMOR MARKERS, MITOTIC FREQUENCY AND DNA PLOIDY

Abstract

The 1988 WHO and International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classifications divide noninvasive papillary bladder tumors into 3 subgroups with different clinical behavior, which seems to be an advantage compared with the 1973 WHO classification. A disadvantage is that the high grade carcinoma group contains 2 subgroups with different progression rates and immunohistochemical marker profiles, corresponding to the 1999 WHO grades 2 and 3. Grade 2 tumors in patients that progressed in stage years later seem to have different immunohistochemical and molecular marker profiles compared to those in matched controls.