The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal · 2006 · 295 citations · 37 references
DentistryPlastic SurgerySpeech-language PathologyAuditingCleft Palate SurgeryCraniofacial SurgeryCleft Lip RepairCleft Palate ReconstructionCleft Palate RepairPharyngeal Cleft RepairSecondary Palate RepairSpeech Perception OutcomesCleft Lip AssessmentCleft Palate CareCleft Palate Speech TherapyOral CleftOrofacial Function AssessmentPalatal Function AssessmentSpeech Outcome EvaluationSpeech Outcomes After Palatal Repair
OBJECTIVES: To develop an assessment tool for use in intercenter audit studies of cleft speech and to test its acceptability, validity, and reliability. The tool is to be used systematically to record and report speech outcomes, providing an indication of treatment needs and continuing burden of care. SETTING: Regional Cleft Center, U.K. METHODS: The Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented (CAPS-A) was developed by three cleft speech experts who identified the key features required from existing assessment measures. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented outcomes reported for 20 cases with clinical assessment results and other investigations. Intra- and interrater reliability were tested following the training of specialist speech and language therapists who used the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented on two occasions to assess 10 cases. The raters evaluated acceptability and ease of using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean percentage agreement for criterion validity in each section was 87% (range 70% to 100%). Both intra- and interexaminer reliability were rated as good/very good (Kappa 0.61 to 1.00) for seven sections and moderate (Kappa 0.41 to 0.60) for three sections. Raters reported that the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented was acceptable and easy to use with appropriate training. CONCLUSION: An acceptable, valid, and reliable cleft speech audit tool has been developed based on a small sample. The Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented is recommended for use in intercenter audit studies in the U.K. and Ireland and could be used in other English-speaking countries. In addition, it has wider applicability for use in reporting speech outcomes of surgical procedures.
37
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
J. Richard Landis, Gary G. Koch · Biometrics · 1977 · 78.9K citations · Full text
The National Institute for Clinical Excellence
Nursing Management · 2001 · 3.9K citations
Debbie Sell, Anne Harding, Pamela Grunwell · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · 1999 · 280 citations