Journal of Accounting and Economics · 1998 · 1.3K citations · 11 references
BusinessAccountancyFinanceFinancial EconomicsForecastingUnderwritingCognitive Biases In InvestingFinancial UnderwritingInvestor PsychologyAnalyst Earnings ForecastsAnnouncement ReturnsUnderwriter Role
We examine the effect of underwriting relationships on analysts' earnings forecasts and recommendations. Lead and co‑underwriter analysts issue more favorable growth forecasts and recommendations than unaffiliated analysts, yet their earnings forecasts are not higher; investors react similarly to strong buy/buy recommendations, but hold recommendations from lead underwriters produce significantly more negative short‑term returns, indicating lead analysts are more likely to recommend hold when a sell is warranted, while post‑announcement returns are comparable across affiliations.
We examine the effect of underwriting relationships on analysts' earnings forecasts and recommendations. Lead and co-underwriter analysts' growth forecasts and recommendations are significantly more favorable than those made by unaffiliated analysts, although their earnings forecasts are not generally greater. Investors respond similarly to lead underwriter and unaffiliated `Strong buy' and `Buy' recommendations, but three-day returns to lead underwriter `Hold' recommendations are significantly more negative than those to unaffiliated `Hold' recommendations. The findings suggest investors expect lead analysts are more likely to recommend `Hold' when `Sell' is warranted. The post-announcement returns following affiliated and unaffiliated analysts' recommendations are not significantly different.
11
Tim Loughran, Jay R. Ritter · The Journal of Finance · 1995 · 3.4K citations
Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?
Kent L. Womack · The Journal of Finance · 1996 · 1.8K citations
Social Sciences, Economics, Finance +17