Risk perception – issues for flood management in Europe

TLDR

Flood risk management often fails because public perception of risk is overlooked and differs from scientific views. The paper explores how public perception can shape flood risk communication strategies across Europe using a novel approach. The study surveyed 1,375 respondents in 13 communities across six European countries as part of the URFlood and FREEMAN projects. Risk perception is framed as a pillar of social resilience, and the study yields recommendations for enhancing flood risk management plans via public participation. Abstract.

Abstract

Abstract. Public perception of flood risk and flood risk information is often overlooked when developing flood risk management plans. As scientists and the public at large perceive risk in very different ways, flood risk management strategies are known to have failed in the past due to this disconnect between authorities and the public. This paper uses a novel approach in exploring the role of public perception in developing flood risk communication strategies in Europe. Results are presented of extensive quantitative research of 1375 questionnaire responses from thirteen communities at risk across six European countries. The research forms part of two research projects funded under the 2nd ERA-Net CRUE Funding Initiative: URFlood and FREEMAN. Risk perception is conceptualised as a pillar of social resilience, representing an innovative approach to the issue. From this process recommendations are identified for improving flood risk management plans through public participation.