Publication | Closed Access
The Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism
544
Citations
16
References
2005
Year
Citizen JournalismFake NewsPublic OpinionRhetoricCommunicationMedia IndustriesPop CultureDaily ShowPopular CultureMedia StudiesJournalismDiscursive IntegrationInteractive JournalismConstructive JournalismJournalism EthicsPolitical CommunicationSocio-political StudiesMedia InstitutionsJon StewartArtsNews CoverageGlobal MediaTelevisionJournalism HistoryCritical Media StudiesMass CommunicationPolitical JournalismPolitical Science
The boundaries between news, entertainment, public affairs, and pop culture are increasingly blurred, and The Daily Show sits at this intersection as a hybrid comedy‑news program whose significance for political communication may run deeper than its dismissal as “fake” news. The study locates The Daily Show within a media landscape shaped by technological multiplication, economic consolidation, and discursive integration, and interprets it as an experimental form of journalism rather than mere “fake” news. The show employs techniques from news, comedy, and talk‑show genres to revive critical journalism and promote deliberative democracy. The program’s growing popularity demonstrates that The Daily Show offers valuable lessons for 21st‑century political journalism.
The boundaries between news and entertainment, and between public affairs and pop culture, have become difficult if not impossible to discern. At the intersection of those borders sits The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, a hybrid blend of comedy, news, and political conversation that is difficult to pigeon hole. Although the program often is dismissed as being “fake” news, its significance for political communication may run much deeper. This study first locates The Daily Show within an emerging media environment defined by the forces of technological multiplication, economic consolidation, and discursive integration, a landscape in which “real” news is becoming increasingly harder to identify or define. It then offers an interpretive reading of the program that understands the show not as “fake news,” but as an experiment in journalism. It argues that the show uses techniques drawn from genres of news, comedy, and television talk to revive a journalism of critical inquiry and advance a model of deliberative democracy. Given the increasing popularity of the program, this essay concludes that The Daily Show has much to teach us about the possibilities of political journalism in the 21st century.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1