Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated With Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity?

John T. Jost, Jaime L. Napier, Hulda Þórisdóttir, Samuel D. Gosling, Tibor P. Palfai, Brian D. Ostafin

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · 2007 · 679 citations · 55 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The authors conduct three studies to test the uncertainty‑threat model of political conservatism, which links psychological needs to manage uncertainty and threat with political orientation. The studies assess the model by evaluating the relationships between uncertainty avoidance, threat management, and political orientation. Structural equation models reveal that uncertainty avoidance (e.g., need for order, intolerance of ambiguity) and threat management (e.g., death anxiety, system threat) each independently predict conservatism, with no support for their association only with ideological extremism; resistance to change fully mediates the uncertainty‑avoidance link, while opposition to equality partially mediates the threat link.

Abstract

Three studies are conducted to assess the uncertainty- threat model of political conservatism, which posits that psychological needs to manage uncertainty and threat are associated with political orientation. Results from structural equation models provide consistent support for the hypothesis that uncertainty avoidance (e.g., need for order, intolerance of ambiguity, and lack of openness to experience) and threat management (e.g., death anxiety, system threat, and perceptions of a dangerous world) each contributes independently to conservatism (vs. liberalism). No support is obtained for alternative models, which predict that uncertainty and threat management are associated with ideological extremism or extreme forms of conservatism only. Study 3 also reveals that resistance to change fully mediates the association between uncertainty avoidance and conservatism, whereas opposition to equality partially mediates the association between threat and conservatism. Implications for understanding the epistemic and existential bases of political orientation are discussed.

References

55