Publication | Closed Access
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
743
Citations
126
References
2010
Year
Decision TimeEngineeringBehavioral Decision MakingDecision AnalysisCognitionHuman Performance ModelingDetection TechniqueAttentionSocial SciencesBiomedical Signal AnalysisStatistical Signal ProcessingExperimental Decision MakingUncertainty QuantificationSystems EngineeringCognitive AnalysisSignal DetectionCognitive NeuroscienceDecision TheoryStatisticsCognitive ScienceBehavioral SciencesDrift Diffusion ProcessExperimental PsychologySignal ProcessingPerception-action LoopConfidence RatingDecision Science
The 3 most often‑used performance measures in the cognitive and decision sciences are choice, response or decision time, and confidence. The study develops a two‑stage dynamic signal detection theory that explains choice, decision time, and confidence using a single underlying process. The model employs a drift‑diffusion process for choice and decision time, then continues evidence accumulation after the choice, and judges interrupt the process to map accumulated evidence into confidence ratings. The model reproduces all known interrelationships among choice, decision time, and confidence, fits their distributions in perceptual and knowledge tasks, shows how time pressure moderates accuracy, and predicts an optimal strategy for rapid, accurate confidence judgments that observers follow.
The 3 most often-used performance measures in the cognitive and decision sciences are choice, response or decision time, and confidence. We develop a random walk/diffusion theory-2-stage dynamic signal detection (2DSD) theory-that accounts for all 3 measures using a common underlying process. The model uses a drift diffusion process to account for choice and decision time. To estimate confidence, we assume that evidence continues to accumulate after the choice. Judges then interrupt the process to categorize the accumulated evidence into a confidence rating. The model explains all known interrelationships between the 3 indices of performance. Furthermore, the model also accounts for the distributions of each variable in both a perceptual and general knowledge task. The dynamic nature of the model also reveals the moderating effects of time pressure on the accuracy of choice and confidence. Finally, the model specifies the optimal solution for giving the fastest choice and confidence rating for a given level of choice and confidence accuracy. Judges are found to act in a manner consistent with the optimal solution when making confidence judgments.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1