Publication | Closed Access
Survey and benchmark of block ciphers for wireless sensor networks
291
Citations
33
References
2006
Year
EngineeringInformation SecurityCryptographic TechnologyBlock CipherHardware SecurityWireless SecurityBlock CiphersInternet Of ThingsAvailable StorageCryptanalytic AttackCryptanalysisData Encryption StandardAvailable MemoryComputer EngineeringLightweight CryptographyCryptosystemComputer ScienceData SecurityCryptographySecurityOperation Mode
Cryptographic algorithms are essential for wireless sensor network security, and choosing storage‑ and energy‑efficient block ciphers is critical due to limited resources, yet no systematic study has been performed. The authors construct an evaluation framework to identify suitable block cipher candidates for WSNs. The framework evaluates candidates by assessing security properties, storage requirements, and energy consumption. The evaluation identifies Skipjack, MISTY1, and Rijndael as optimal for different memory and security scenarios, recommending Output Feedback Mode for pairwise links and Cipher Block Chaining for group communications.
Cryptographic algorithms play an important role in the security architecture of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Choosing the most storage- and energy-efficient block cipher is essential, due to the facts that these networks are meant to operate without human intervention for a long period of time with little energy supply, and that available storage is scarce on these sensor nodes. However, to our knowledge, no systematic work has been done in this area so far. We construct an evaluation framework in which we first identify the candidates of block ciphers suitable for WSNs, based on existing literature and authoritative recommendations. For evaluating and assessing these candidates, we not only consider the security properties but also the storage- and energy-efficiency of the candidates. Finally, based on the evaluation results, we select the most suitable ciphers for WSNs, namely Skipjack, MISTY1, and Rijndael, depending on the combination of available memory and required security (energy efficiency being implicit). In terms of operation mode, we recommend Output Feedback Mode for pairwise links but Cipher Block Chaining for group communications.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1