The economics of risks to life.

Arthur Wb

PubMed · 1981 · 142 citations · 8 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Loss of life at a specific age should be evaluated by the opportunity cost of expected years of living, production, and reproduction, minus expected social support costs. The study investigates the lifetime net effect of activities that alter age‑specific mortality risks and the cost to an individual of random life‑taking events at a given age. The model shows that changes in mortality schedules should be valued by expected additional life‑years, production, and reproduction minus social support costs, and that current methods omit a key social transfer term, with the value of a life lost being highly age‑dependent and sensitive to diminishing returns to consumption.

Abstract

This study asks two questions: (1) What is the net to the representative individual over his life-time of activities that alter age-specific mortality risks? (2) What is the cost to the representative individual of activities that take a life at random at a given age? Results, derived from an economic-demographic model with full age-specific accounting have a strong actuarial flavor: alterations in the mortality schedule, caused say by a medical breakthrough, should be assessed on the utility of expected additional life-years, production, and reproduction, less expected social costs of support. Loss of life at a specific age, due to an accident say, should be assessed on the opportunity costs of expected years of living, production and reproduction, less expected social support costs. The results show that current methods, in general, leave out an important social transfer term, that value of a life lost is highly age-dependent, and that the degree of diminishing returns to consumption is crucial in calculations of the economic cost of risks.

References

8