Publication | Closed Access
Assessment of Energy Distribution Losses for Increasing Penetration of Distributed Generation
615
Citations
22
References
2006
Year
Distributed Energy SystemElectrical EngineeringEngineeringEnergy Distribution LossesSmart GridEnergy EfficiencyEnergy ManagementPower InjectionsDg Penetration LevelEnergy DistributionElectric Power DistributionSystems EngineeringDistributed Energy GenerationElectric Grid IntegrationDistributed GenerationPower NetworkPower SystemsEnergy Losses
High penetration of distributed generation challenges traditional power systems by altering network flows and energy losses. The study proposes a method to compute annual energy loss variations for varying DG penetration and concentration levels. The approach analyzes loss impacts of different DG technologies—including CHP, wind, PV, and fuel cells—across the network. The results reveal that DG does not always reduce losses, showing a U‑shaped loss trajectory with penetration, greater loss reductions when units are dispersed, wind power performs worst, and reactive‑power‑controlled units improve voltage and lower losses.
High levels of penetration of distributed generation (DG) are a new challenge for traditional electric power systems. Power injections from DGs change network power flows modifying energy losses. Although it is considered that DG reduce losses, this paper shows that this is not always true. This paper presents an approach to compute annual energy losses variations when different penetration and concentration levels of DG are connected to a distribution network. In addition, the impact on losses of different DG technologies, such as combined heat and power, wind power, photovoltaic, and fuel-cells, is analyzed. Results show that energy losses variation, as a function of the DG penetration level, presents a characteristic U-shape trajectory. Moreover, when DG units are more dispersed along network feeders, higher losses reduction can be expected. Regarding DG technologies, it should be noted that wind power is the one that shows the worst behavior in losses reduction. Finally, DG units with reactive power control provide a better network voltage profile and lower losses.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1