Publication | Open Access
A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components in Complex Products
241
Citations
48
References
2007
Year
EngineeringIndustrial EngineeringInteraction NetworkNetwork AnalysisSocial SciencesNetwork ComplexityModule DesignSystems EngineeringModularityComponent ModularitySocial Network AnalysisComplex ProductsModular DesignDesignNetwork ApproachComputer ScienceNetwork TheorySoftware DesignIndustrial DesignDefine ModularityNetwork ScienceGraph TheoryModular ConstructionProduct Modeling
Modularity has been defined at product and system levels, but little effort has been made to define and quantify it at the component level. The study defines component modularity for complex products as a network of components sharing technical interfaces, based on the lack of connectivity among them, and outlines future research directions. Using graph theory and social network analysis, the authors introduce three centrality‑based measures of component modularity—direct interface connectivity, propagated design interface influence, and bridging roles—applied to a large commercial aircraft engine to assess how modularity affects component redesign. The results indicate that the effect of component modularity on redesign varies with the type of interfaces linking product components.
Modularity has been defined at the product and system levels. However, little effort has gone into defining and quantifying modularity at the component level. We consider complex products as a network of components that share technical interfaces (or connections) in order to function as a whole and define component modularity based on the lack of connectivity among them. Building upon previous work in graph theory and social network analysis, we define three measures of component modularity based on the notion of centrality. Our measures consider how components share direct interfaces with adjacent components, how design interfaces may propagate to nonadjacent components in the product, and how components may act as bridges among other components through their interfaces. We calculate and interpret all three measures of component modularity by studying the product architecture of a large commercial aircraft engine. We illustrate the use of these measures to test the impact of modularity on component redesign. Our results show that the relationship between component modularity and component redesign depends on the type of interfaces connecting product components. We also discuss directions for future work.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1