Publication | Open Access
Neoliberalism as language policy
637
Citations
26
References
2013
Year
Language PolicyUniversity RankingsEast Asian StudiesMultilingualismGlobal EnglishEducationLanguage EducationGlobal StudiesLanguage TeachingWorld LanguagesLanguage StudiesHigher Education PolicySouth KoreaSociolinguisticsEast Asian LanguagesInternational EducationHigher EducationGlobalizationForeign Language EducationSecond Language StudiesSocial FoundationsLanguage PlanningEducation PolicyLinguistics
Neoliberalism functions as a covert language policy that promotes the global spread of English, a dynamic intensified by the 1997/98 Asian financial crisis, the rise of competitiveness as a core value, and the manipulation of internationalization criteria in university rankings. The study aims to reflect on the social costs of elevating competitiveness as a core value that shapes language choice. The authors analyze the spread of English as a medium of instruction in South Korean higher education, showing that competition is structured by testing, assessment, and ranking mechanisms that privilege English, with university rankings serving as a covert language policy. The authors conclude that elevating competitiveness as a core value imposes social costs on language choice. Keywords: English as a global language,.
Abstract This article explores how an economic ideology—neoliberalism—serves as a covert language policy mechanism pushing the global spread of English. Our analysis builds on a case study of the spread of English as a medium of instruction (MoI) in South Korean higher education. The Asian financial crisis of 1997/98 was the catalyst for a set of socioeconomic transformations that led to the imposition of “competitiveness” as a core value. Competition is heavily structured through a host of testing, assessment, and ranking mechanisms, many of which explicitly privilege English as a terrain where individual and societal worth are established. University rankings are one such mechanism structuring competition and constituting a covert form of language policy. One ranking criterion—internationalization—is particularly easy to manipulate and strongly favors English MoI. We conclude by reflecting on the social costs of elevating competitiveness to a core value enacted on the terrain of language choice. (English as a global language, globalization, higher education, medium of instruction (MoI), neoliberalism, South Korea, university rankings)*
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1