Publication | Closed Access
Assessing “Neighborhood Effects”: Social Processes and New Directions in Research
3.9K
Citations
79
References
2002
Year
Community DevelopmentPopulation YouthUrban HealthRoutine Activity PatternsSocial EnvironmentCommunity EnvironmentCommunity PerceptionSocial ImpactSociologyNeighborhood TiesUrban SocietyYouth Well-beingSocial ProcessesSocial Determinants Of HealthPublic HealthSocial SciencesConcentrated Poverty
The paper reviews and synthesizes the emerging neighborhood‑effects literature on how social processes influence problem behaviors and health outcomes. It evaluates social‑interactional and institutional mechanisms—such as neighborhood ties, social control, mutual trust, institutional resources, disorder, and routine activity patterns—while addressing methodological challenges like selection bias. The review found over 40 studies and recommends future research strategies, including experimental designs, rigorous spatial and temporal analyses, systematic observations, and benchmark data on neighborhood social processes.
▪ Abstract This paper assesses and synthesizes the cumulative results of a new “neighborhood-effects” literature that examines social processes related to problem behaviors and health-related outcomes. Our review identified over 40 relevant studies published in peer-reviewed journals from the mid-1990s to 2001, the take-off point for an increasing level of interest in neighborhood effects. Moving beyond traditional characteristics such as concentrated poverty, we evaluate the salience of social-interactional and institutional mechanisms hypothesized to account for neighborhood-level variations in a variety of phenomena (e.g., delinquency, violence, depression, high-risk behavior), especially among adolescents. We highlight neighborhood ties, social control, mutual trust, institutional resources, disorder, and routine activity patterns. We also discuss a set of thorny methodological problems that plague the study of neighborhood effects, with special attention to selection bias. We conclude with promising strategies and directions for future research, including experimental designs, taking spatial and temporal dynamics seriously, systematic observational approaches, and benchmark data on neighborhood social processes.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1