Journal of Athletic Training · 2014 · 22 citations · 20 references
Negligible differences were exhibited between PIP and DIP, with both displaying acceptable reliability and validity compared with the MAN. However, the Bland-Altman analysis suggests underestimation bias for the DIP and PIP as Usg increases, with the potential for rare but substantial underestimation when using PIP that should be recognized by clinicians, particularly when used as a screening measure in weight-class sports.
20
Exercise and Fluid Replacement
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2007 · 1.4K citations
Urinary Indices of Hydration Status
Lawrence E. Armstrong, Carl M. Maresh, John W. Castellani et al. · International Journal of Sport Nutrition · 1994 · 742 citations · Full text