PubMed · 1995 · 47 citations · 15 references
Natural SciencesNutritionAnalytical ChemistryCalcium HomeostasisElemental AnalysisAnalytical MeasurementsBioanalytical Method ValidationClinical AnalysisElectrolyte AnalysisElectrolyte BalanceInstrumental AnalysisBiomedical Sample AnalysisCalcium Homeostasis AssessmentElectrolyte Analysis In Body FluidsElectrolyte BiomarkersReference Interval DeterminationSerum Calcium MeasurementSerum Electrolyte MeasurementSerum Magnesium Measurement
We compared two ion-selective analyzers (AVL 988-4 and NOVA CRT) for determining ionized calcium (iCa2+), ionized magnesium (iMg2+), sodium (Na+), and pH in serum specimens from healthy and diseased individuals. For assays of three levels of protein-based control materials, total imprecision (CV) was < 3% for all analytes except iMg2+ (< or = 6.5% on NOVA, and < or = 4.9% on AVL). We found a significant difference between the analyzers (P < 0.001) for the mean iMg2+ concentration in patients but no significant correlation (r = 0.253) between the analyzers for iMg2+ in specimens from healthy volunteers, even though the mean iMg2+ concentration did not differ significantly between these groups. The reference interval (central 95 percentiles) for iMg2+ with AVL (0.44-0.60 mmol/L) was contained within that of NOVA (0.39-0.64 mmol/L). The AVL gave higher values for iCa2+ (P < 0.001) and lower values for pH (P < 0.001) in specimens from normal volunteers and patients. The mean value for Na+ in patients' samples was significantly higher by the NOVA (P < 0.01) than by the AVL analyzer. Thus, we found significant differences between these two analyzers for all four analytes.
15
Ion-selective membrane electrodes for clinical use.
U. Oesch, Daniel Ammann, W. Simon · Clinical Chemistry · 1986 · 328 citations · Full text
B. T. Altura, Terry Shirey, Chohee Young et al. · Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · 1994 · 128 citations