Publication | Closed Access
Phasor Measurement Unit Placement Techniques for Complete and Incomplete Observability
574
Citations
6
References
2005
Year
EngineeringPower Grid OperationMeasurementEducationInstrumentation EngineeringSystem MeasurementIncomplete ObservabilityReliability EngineeringCalibrationPower SystemSystems EngineeringInstrumentationPower SystemsPower System AnalysisElectrical EngineeringWide Area MonitoringPower NetworkSmart GridEnergy ManagementOptimal LocationElectric Power DistributionMeasurement System
The study develops PMU placement techniques for power systems with incomplete observability, introducing the depth‑of‑unobservability metric to guide placement decisions. The authors employ spanning‑tree based search to locate optimal PMU sites, then extend the model to account for communication constraints and phased installation using a Simulated Annealing formulation, validated on two utilities and IEEE test systems. The proposed methods enable utilities to incrementally deploy PMUs in a cost‑efficient manner, demonstrating systematic placement that mitigates cost impact.
This paper presents techniques for identifying placement sites for phasor measurement units (PMUs) in a power system based on incomplete observability. The novel concept of depth of unobservability is introduced and its impact on the number of PMU placements is explained. Initially, we make use of spanning trees of the power system graph and a tree search technique to find the optimal location of PMUs. We then extend the modeling to recognize limitations in the availability of communication facilities around the network and pose the constrained placement problem within the framework of Simulated Annealing (SA). The SA formulation was further extended to solve the pragmatic phased installation of PMUs. The performance of these methods is tested on two electric utility systems and IEEE test systems. Results show that these techniques provide utilities with systematic approaches for incrementally placing PMUs thereby cushioning their cost impact.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1