Limnology and Oceanography · 1979 · 416 citations · 16 references
AgricultureSoil SciencesGeochemistrySoil BiogeochemistrySoil ChemistrySalt Marsh EcologySulfur CycleSulfur CyclingWetland BiogeochemistryWetland Nutrient CyclingWetland Soil BiogeochemistryAssimilatory Sulfate ReductionBelowground Primary ProductionEcosystem ProcessRedox Reactions In WetlandsSalt Marsh BiogeochemistrySulfate ReductionSulfate Reduction PathwaysSulfur Biogeochemistry Of Wetlands
Sulfate reduction rates were measured for 2 years in the peat of a salt marsh by a radiotracer technique. Rates are high throughout the peat, from the surface to more than 20 cm deep. The integrated annual rate is about 75 mol SO 4 2− ·m −2 ·yr −1 , the highest yet reported for any natural ecosystem. Sulfate reduction accounts for the consumption of 1,800 g org‐C·m −2 ·yr −1 , about equal to net primary production in the marsh. Respiration using other electron acceptors (such as oxygen or nitrate) is much less important. Sulfate reduction rates in the peat of the salt marsh are probably high for at least three reasons: the belowground production of Spartina alterniflora provides a large, annual input of organic substrates over a depth of some 20 cm; sulfate is rapidly resupplied to the peat in infiltrating tidal waters, so that sulfate depletion never limits the rate of reduction; and sulfide concentrations remain below toxic levels. The stable pyrite (FeS 2 ) is a major end product of sulfate reduction in the marsh peat while iron monosulfide (FeS) is not. If the incorporation of 35 S into pyrite were not measured, the [ 35 S]SO 4 2− reduction measurements would greatly underestimate the true rate of sulfate reduction. Pyrite acts largely as a temporary store of reduced sulfur, with seasonal changes in its concentration.
16
Energy Flow in the Salt Marsh Ecosystem of Georgia
John M. Teal · Ecology · 1962 · 1.1K citations
AN IMPROVED INTERSTITIAL WATER SAMPLER1
William S. Reeburgh · Limnology and Oceanography · 1967 · 411 citations · Full text