From Brokdorf to Fukushima: The long journey to nuclear phase-out

Alexander Glaser

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists · 2012 · 67 citations · 1 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Germany’s nuclear phase‑out has roots in 1970s anti‑nuclear protests, the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, and a long‑standing policy consensus that halted new reactor construction. The study examines whether Germany’s accelerated replacement of nuclear power can serve as a proof‑of‑concept for the political and technical feasibility of abandoning high‑risk nuclear energy. The authors trace how a tacit policy consensus guided energy forecasts toward efficiency, demand reduction, and renewables, shaping Germany’s phase‑out strategy. By the time of Fukushima, Germany’s energy priorities had begun to take effect, and its phase‑out may become a global game‑changer for nuclear energy.

Abstract

Shortly after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Germany's government started preparing legislation that would close the country's last nuclear power plant by 2022. But this wasn't an entirely new development: Germany had been planning to leave nuclear energy behind for decades, and to understand its nuclear phase-out requires a close look at the past. Several projects and events mark the beginnings of the German anti-nuclear power movement: Among them are the huge protests over the Brokdorf reactor, which began in 1976 and led to civil war-like confrontations with police, and the controversy over the Kalkar fast-neutron reactor in the mid-1970s. Because of these and subsequent developments—including the 1986 Chernobyl accident—by the 1990s, no one in German political life seriously entertained the idea of new reactor construction. This tacit policy consensus led to energy forecasts and scenarios that focused on energy efficiency, demand reduction, and renewable energy sources. By the time of the Fukushima accidents, many of these new energy priorities had already begun to be implemented and to show effect. Replacing nuclear power in Germany with other energy sources on an accelerated schedule is likely to come with a price tag, but, at the same time, Germany's nuclear phase-out could provide a proof-of-concept, demonstrating the political and technical feasibility of abandoning a controversial high-risk technology. Germany's nuclear phase-out, successful or not, may well become a game changer for nuclear energy worldwide.

References

1