The Scientific World JOURNAL · 2015 · 43 citations · 29 references
DentistryEndodonticsEndodontic InstrumentationRoot Canal TherapySurgical EndodonticsIrrigation During InstrumentationIrrigation ProtocolsRoot Canal ObturationAnalytical BalancesApical Extrusion Of DebrisCanalsExtrusionMann - Whitney U TestResidual Debris AssessmentRoot Canal Debris Removal
This study aimed to analyse and compare apical extrusion of debris in canals instrumented with systems used in reciprocating and continuous motion. Sixty mandibular premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20): the Reciproc (REC), WaveOne (WO), and HyFlex CM (HYF) groups. One Eppendorf tube per tooth was weighed in advance on an analytical balance. The root canals were instrumented according to the manufacturer's instructions, and standardised irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite was performed to a total volume of 9 mL. After instrumentation, the teeth were removed from the Eppendorf tubes and incubated at 37°C for 15 days to evaporate the liquid. The tubes were weighed again, and the difference between the initial and final weight was calculated to determine the weight of the debris. The data were statistically analysed using the Shapiro-Wilk, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney tests (α = 5%). All systems resulted in the apical extrusion of debris. Reciproc produced significantly more debris than WaveOne (p < 0.05), and both systems produced a greater apical extrusion of debris than HyFlex CM (p < 0.001). Cross section and motion influenced the results, despite tip standardization.
29
Sebastian Bürklein, K. Hinschitza, Till Dammaschke et al. · International Endodontic Journal · 2011 · 562 citations
Hyeon‐Cheol Kim, Sang Won Kwak, Gary S.P. Cheung et al. · Journal of Endodontics · 2011 · 385 citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +12