Publication | Open Access
Robust Markov Decision Processes
294
Citations
23
References
2012
Year
Bayesian Decision TheoryEngineeringProbabilistic LearningMarkov Decision ProcessesAutonomous SystemsStochastic SimulationUncertainty QuantificationHidden Markov ModelStochastic ProcessesManagementUnknown ParametersSystems EngineeringDecision MakingRobust OptimizationStochastic DynamicSequential Decision MakingComputer ScienceProbability TheoryUncertainty RepresentationMarkov Decision ProcessStochastic Optimization
Markov decision processes are powerful tools for decision making in uncertain dynamic environments, yet their solutions are limited by sensitivity to unknown distributional parameters that must be estimated. This work introduces robust MDPs that mitigate estimation errors by providing probabilistic guarantees for unknown parameters. By leveraging an observation history, the authors construct a confidence region containing the true parameters with probability 1–β and then compute a policy that maximizes worst‑case performance over this region using tractable conic programs. The resulting policy achieves or surpasses its worst‑case performance with at least 1–β confidence.
Markov decision processes (MDPs) are powerful tools for decision making in uncertain dynamic environments. However, the solutions of MDPs are of limited practical use because of their sensitivity to distributional model parameters, which are typically unknown and have to be estimated by the decision maker. To counter the detrimental effects of estimation errors, we consider robust MDPs that offer probabilistic guarantees in view of the unknown parameters. To this end, we assume that an observation history of the MDP is available. Based on this history, we derive a confidence region that contains the unknown parameters with a prespecified probability 1-β. Afterward, we determine a policy that attains the highest worst-case performance over this confidence region. By construction, this policy achieves or exceeds its worst-case performance with a confidence of at least 1-β. Our method involves the solution of tractable conic programs of moderate size.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1