The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science

David Demeritt

Annals of the Association of American Geographers · 2001 · 720 citations · 117 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Critics note that the reductionist framing of climate change serves various political purposes, yet instrumental critiques often overlook how politics is embedded in science from the outset. The article aims to describe the scientific construction of climate change as a global environmental problem rooted in greenhouse gases, to expose the tacit social and epistemic commitments of its practices, and to raise questions about trust, uncertainty, and expertise. This is achieved by retracing the history of climate modeling and related controversies to reveal the underlying social and epistemic commitments. The framing of climate change reinforces technocratic global management, yet the dominant science‑led formulation is politically brittle, underscoring the need for a reflexive politics grounded in active trust. Keywords: climate change, social constructionism, social studies of science.

Abstract

Abstract Having outlined a theory of heterogeneous social construction, this article describes the scientific construction of climate change as a global-scale environmental problem caused by the universal physical properties of greenhouse gases. Critics have noted that this reductionist formulation serves a variety of political purposes, but instrumental and interest-based critiques of the use of scientific knowledge tend to ignore the ways in which a politics gets built into science at the upstream end. By retracing the history of climate modeling and of several scientific controversies, I unmask the tacit social and epistemic commitments implied by its specific practices. The specific scientific framing of global climate change has reinforced and been reinforced by the technocratic inclinations of global climate management. The social organization of climate change science and its articulation with the political process raise important questions about trust, uncertainty, and expertise. The article concludes with a discussion of the political brittleness of this dominant science-led and global-scale formulation of the climate change problem and the need for a more reflexive politics of climate change and of scientific knowledge based on active trust. Keywords:: climate changesocial constructionismsocial studies of science

References

117