Development Policy Review · 2013 · 151 citations · 18 references
Public AffairsNatural Resource GovernancePublic PolicyResource GovernanceResource PolicyResource TaxationAccountabilityGovernment Performance ReportingGovernment TransparencyNatural Resource AccountingTransparency MeasuresAccountability In ExtractivesExtractive Industries GovernanceExtractive Industry GovernanceExtractive Industry Revenue TransparencyExtractive Revenue GovernanceInstitutional Change MechanismsInstitutional Reporting MechanismsTransparency In Extractives
The rapid growth in the past decade in transparency and accountability initiatives (TAIs) in the extractive industries sector reflects attempts to devise institutional mechanisms to make governments accountable for the extraction, allocation and use of revenues that, if well invested, could alleviate socio‐economic inequalities among citizens. Understanding and measuring the impact and effectiveness of these initiatives is a matter of proposing and empirically validating a causal link between interventions and governance improvements. To do this requires improved data collection, reporting and analysis; a stronger focus on the allocation and use of government expenditures that come from natural‐resource wealth; and a better understanding of importance of incentives and sanctions for ensuring effective impact.
18
Greed and grievance in civil war
Paul Collier · Oxford Economic Papers · 2004 · 6K citations
Institutions and the Resource Curse
Halvor Mehlum, Karl Ove Moene, Ragnar Torvik · The Economic Journal · 2006 · 2.8K citations · Full text
The Political Economy of the Resource Curse
Michael L. Ross · World Politics · 1999 · 2K citations