Geophysical Journal International · 2012 · 17 citations · 17 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesGeophysicsEarthquake EngineeringMarine GeophysicsSeismologyEarthquake Early WarningEarthquake LocationEarthquake Source ProcessesRupture DynamicsSeismic Data ProcessingSeismic MonitoringAzimuthal MeasurementEarthquake Rupture MonitoringEarthquake Rupture PropagationEarthquakesP-wave DetectionPolarizationRupture PropagationTsunami Propagation
Rapid estimation of earthquake rupture propagation is essential to declare an early warning for tsunami-generating earthquakes. An increasing number of seismological methods have been developed to determine rupture parameters, such as length, velocity and propagation direction, especially since the occurrence of the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake that resulted in a devastating tsunami in the Indian Ocean region. Here, we present a new method to follow the rupture process in near real time by a polarization analysis of local and regional P phases that permits a faster determination of rupture properties than using teleseismic records. The new technique has the capability to provide detailed information in less than 10 min. Originally, the method stems from a single-station earthquake location method and is expanded here to monitor P-phase polarization variations through time. As the earthquake source moves away from the hypocentre, the backazimuth of an incoming P phase is expected to change accordingly. With polarization analysis we may be able to monitor the temporal change in P-wave backazimuth to follow the rupture process in near real time. Three component P phases are scanned to determine the azimuthal variation as a function of time. The backazimuth of a moving rupture front is determined by the first eigenvector of the covariance matrix. The linearity of the particle motion is used as a measure of the quality of the data. Seismic stations at local and regional distances () are used. We tested the new method with a theoretical simulation and observed seismograms of the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake (2004 December 26, Mw= 9.3), and we were able to follow the rupture for the first 200 s. For larger ruptures, stations at more than 30° epicentral distances would be required. The method is also successfully applied to the Wenchuan earthquake (2008 May 12, Mw= 8.0).
17
Rupture Process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake
Charles J. Ammon, Chen Ji, Hong Kie Thio et al. · Science · 2005 · 763 citations
Extent, duration and speed of the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake imaged by the Hi-Net array
Miaki Ishii, Peter M. Shearer, Heidi Houston et al. · Nature · 2005 · 694 citations
Polarization analysis of three-component array data
Andy Jurkevics · 1988 · 531 citations