Alaskan earthquake of 1964 and Chilean earthquake of 1960: Implications for arc tectonics

Abstract

The 1964 Alaskan earthquake (Ms ≈ 8.4) involved a segment of the eastern Aleutian arc 800 gm long; the 1960 Chilean earthquake sequence (Ms ≈ 8.5) affected roughly 100 km of the southern Peru-Chile arc. These two major events are strikingly similar in that (1) seismicity was shallow (<70 km), the earthquake focal regions and most of the associated tectonic deformation being between the oceanic trenches and volcanic chains of the two arcs; (2) regional vertical displacements were characterized by broad asymmetric downwarps elongate parallel to the arcs with flanking zones of marked uplift on the seaward sides and minor, possibly local, uplift on the landward sides; and (3) horizontal displacements, where determined by retriangulation, involved systematic shifts in a generally seaward direction and transverse tensile strains across the zones of subsidence. Surface displacements and seismicity for both events are compatible with dislocation models involving predominantly dip-slip movement of 20 meters or more on major complex thrust faults (megathrusts) inclined at average angles of about 9° beneath the eastern Aleutian arc and perhaps 20° beneath the Peru-Chile arc. The thrust-fault mechanism deduced for both the Alaskan and Chilean earthquakes is broadly consistent with the concept that the sectors of the Pacific rim in which they occurred are major zones of convergence along which the oceanic plates progressively underthrust the less mobile America plate. Directions of convergence between lithospheric plates at these arcs as deduced primarily from paleomagnetic data are in reasonably good agreement with the observed earthquake-related deformation; the deduced rates of convergence, however, appear to be too high in the eastern Aleutian arc and too low in the southern Peru-Chile arc. Despite gross similarities in tectonic setting and the present style of earthquake-related deformation, the geologies of the continental margins in the eastern Aleutian arc and southern Peru-Chile arc differ significantly. This difference suggests that Mesozoic and Cenozoic sediments and volcanic rocks conveyed into the eastern Aleutian trench have progressively accreted to the Alaskan continental margin, whereas most or all of the material carried into the southern Peru-Chile trench has disappeared beneath the Chilean continental margin.