A Foreign Policy Model of U.S. Bilateral Aid Allocation

Robert D. McKinlay, Richard Little

World Politics · 1977 · 391 citations · 20 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Two competing frameworks explain bilateral aid: one based on humanitarian needs and the other on donor foreign‑policy interests, with the latter now prevailing but lacking systematic development. This study develops an analytic foreign‑policy model of aid allocation and tests it through a cross‑national, longitudinal analysis of U.S. aid from 1960 to 1970. The model posits that aid creates commitment and dependency, allowing the donor to realize foreign‑policy utilities that drive its interests, which can be categorized into five substantive policy models.

Abstract

Two views, founded on divergent rationales, have been used to explain the allocation of official bilateral aid. One view explains the allocation of aid in terms of the humanitarian needs of the recipient, the other in terms of the foreign policy interests of the donor. Although the foreign policy view is now clearly dominant, it has not been developed systematically. This paper initially develops an analytic foreign policy model of aid allocation. The model suggests that the provision of aid leads to the establishment of commitment and dependency, enabling the donor to realize certain foreign policy utilities. These utilities in turn allow the donor to pursue its interests. These interests may be ordered into five substantive foreign policy models. The main research objective of the paper is to test these models in the context of U.S. aid by making a cross-national, longitudinal study of the distribution of U.S. aid over the years 1960- 1970. We find that the foreign policy model which best explains the allocation of U.S. aid is one that is consonant with the political interpretation of imperialism.

References

20