Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2011 · 75 citations · 5 references
PharmacyPharmaceutical AnalysisPharmacologyAnalytical ChemistryChromatographic AnalysisMass Spectrometric AnalysisAnalytical ChromatographyBioanalytical Method ValidationChromatographyInstrumental AnalysisLiquid ChromatographyMass SpectrometryAnalytical Method DevelopmentBioanalytical MethodologyChromatographic SelectivityLiquid Chromatography-mass SpectrometryLiquid Chromatography-mass Spectrometry AnalysisMass Spectrometric Drug AnalysisPlasma ComponentsQuantitative Bioanalysis
There is a growing interest in exploring the use of liquid chromatography coupled with full-scan high resolution accurate mass spectrometry (LC/HRMS) in bioanalytical laboratories as an alternative to the current practice of using LC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Therefore, we have investigated the theoretical and practical aspects of LC/HRMS as it relates to the quantitation of drugs in plasma, which is the most commonly used matrix in pharmacokinetics studies. In order to assess the overall selectivity of HRMS, we evaluated the potential interferences from endogenous plasma components by analyzing acetonitrile-precipitated blank human plasma extract using an LC/HRMS system under chromatographic conditions typically used for LC/MS/MS bioanalysis with the acquisition of total ion chromatograms (TICs) using 10 k and 20 k resolving power in both profile and centroid modes. From each TIC, we generated extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of the exact masses of the [M + H](+) ions of 153 model drugs using different mass extraction windows (MEWs) and determined the number of plasma endogenous peaks detected in each EIC. Fewer endogenous peaks are detected using higher resolving power, narrower MEW, and centroid mode. A 20 k resolving power can be considered adequate for the selective determination of drugs in plasma. To achieve desired analyte EIC selectivity and simultaneously avoid missing data points in the analyte EIC peak, the MEW used should not be too wide or too narrow and should be a small fraction of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the profile mass peak. It is recommended that the optimum MEW be established during method development under the specified chromatographic and sample preparation conditions. In general, the optimum MEW, typically ≤ ±20 ppm for 20 k resolving power, is smaller for the profile mode when compared with the centroid mode.
5
Markus Kellmann, Helmut Muenster, Paul Zomer et al. · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2009 · 192 citations · Full text
Anton Kaufmann, Patrick Butcher, Kathryn Maden et al. · Analytica Chimica Acta · 2010 · 184 citations
E. van der Heeft, Y.J.C. Bolck, B. Beumer et al. · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2008 · 134 citations · Full text
Nanyan Rena Zhang, Sean Yu, Philip R. Tiller et al. · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2009 · 130 citations · Full text