Knights, Knaves or Pawns? Human Behaviour and Social Policy

Julian Le Grand

Journal of Social Policy · 1997 · 401 citations · 10 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The welfare state is undergoing two major shifts: the rise of quasi‑market provision and the replacement of fiscal with legal welfare, reflecting a move away from viewing participants as altruistic or passive toward seeing them as self‑interested actors. The article contends that these reforms stem from a change in policymakers’ beliefs about human motivation and calls for robust policies that do not rely on simplistic behavioural assumptions. Because neither the old nor the new behavioural assumptions are evidence‑based, policies grounded in either are equally prone to failure.

Abstract

There are two fundamental changes currently under way in the welfare state. These are the development of quasi-markets in welfare provision, and the supplementation of 'fiscal' welfare by 'legal' welfare: policies that rely on redistributing income through regulation and other legal devices, instead of through the tax and social security system. This article argues that these changes are in part the result of a fundamental shift in policy-makers' beliefs concerning human motivation and behaviour. People who finance, operate and use the welfare state are no longer assumed to be either public spirited altruists (knights) or passive recipients of state largesse (pawns); instead they are all considered to be in one way or another self-interested (knaves). However, since neither the 'new' nor the 'old' set of assumptions are based on evidence, policies based on the new set are as likely to fail as those based on the old. What is needed are 'robust' policies that are not dependent on any simple view of human behaviour.

References

10